JDR Sign up for ETOCs
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Riordan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Riordan, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Banks, J. A.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 70, 1022-1028, Copyright © 1991 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Dental fluorosis and fluoride exposure in Western Australia

P. J. Riordan and J. A. Banks
Community Dental Services, Health Department of Western Australia, Como.

Dental fluorosis in children is reported from many locations, and its prevalence may be increasing. This study aimed to measure fluorosis in 12-year-olds in fluoridated and non-fluoridated areas of Western Australia and to relate this to exposure. School dental clinics in Perth (F- 0.8 mg/L) and the Bunbury area (F- less than 0.2 mg/L) were the sampling units. Parents provided data on residence in fluoridated areas and on use of supplements and toothpaste. Exposure to water and supplemental fluoride between birth and four years was calculated. Clinical examinations (upper left central incisor) based on the TF classifications of fluorosis (which requires teeth to be dried) were conducted for 338 children in Perth and 321 in the Bunbury region. Re-examinations (n = 50) gave a weighted kappa of 0.78. Contingency analysis estimated bivariate relationships, and multiple logistic regression estimated odds ratios (OR) for risk factors. Fluorosis prevalence in the Perth region was 0.40, and in the Bunbury region 0.33 (chi 2 = 3.69, df = 1, p = 0.055). Prevalence was 0.44 in children with fluoride exposure equivalent to optimal water fluoridation and 0.20 among those with the lowest exposure (chi 2 = 35.99, df = 1, p = 0.0001). Increasing exposure was associated with higher fluorosis prevalence and higher TF scores, but overall, 27.3% of participants had TF score 1 (barely discernible), and only 9.4% had TF score greater than or equal to 2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
L.G. Do and A.J. Spencer
Risk-Benefit Balance in the Use of Fluoride among Young Children
J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2007; 86(8): 723 - 728.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
E. D. BELTRAN-AGUILAR, S. O. GRIFFIN, and S. A. LOCKWOOD
Prevalence and trends in enamel fluorosis in the United States from the 1930s to the 1980s
J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2002; 133(2): 157 - 165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
D. G. PENDRYS
RISK OF ENAMEL FLUOROSIS IN NONFLUORIDATED AND OPTIMALLY FLUORIDATED POPULATIONS: CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE DENTAL PROFESSIONAL
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2000; 131(6): 746 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1991 Institutional Access Guidelines