JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lammers, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Dijk, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lammers, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Van Dijk, J. W.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 70, 970-974, Copyright © 1991 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Influence of fluoride and carbonate on in vitro remineralization of bovine enamel

P. C. Lammers, J. M. Borggreven, F. C. Driessens and J. W. Van Dijk
Dental School, Catholic University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

The influence of fluoride, carbonate, and fluoride in combination with carbonate on the in vitro remineralization of bovine enamel was investigated with the use of a sandwich technique. After demineralization, enamel slices were subjected for 610 h to remineralizing solutions with 0.03 or 1.0 ppm fluoride. At each fluoride level, either 0, 1, 10, 20, or 25 mmol/L carbonate was tested. After 0, 22, 62, 126, 192, 329, and 610 h of remineralization, contact microradiographs were made by Cu K alpha-radiation. At 0.03 ppm fluoride, carbonate had an inhibiting influence on remineralization. At 1.0 ppm fluoride, the inhibiting influence of carbonate changed into a stimulation of remineralizatization at 20 and 25 mmol/L carbonate. At 0, 1, and 10 mmol/L carbonate, fluoride had an inhibiting influence on remineralization. The differences in remineralization between the groups were explained by events concerning crystal growth, i.e., different types of minerals might have precipitated with differences in precipitation rates, and retardation of a precipitation step might have occurred under the various remineralization conditions. There was a mutual influence of fluoride and carbonate on the remineralization process. We conclude that the composition of the remineralizing solution with respect to fluoride and carbonate concentrations is important for the remineralization process.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1991 Institutional Access Guidelines