JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Noort, R.
Right arrow Articles by Noroozi, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Noort, R.
Right arrow Articles by Noroozi, S.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 70, 889-893, Copyright © 1991 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

The effect of local interfacial geometry on the measurement of the tensile bond strength to dentin

R. Van Noort, G. E. Cardew, I. C. Howard and S. Noroozi
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, United Kingdom.

The local detail of the geometry of the adhesive interface can have a significant effect on the measurement of dentin bond strengths and may be a contributory factor in the discrepancies among data in the published literature. The potential effect on the dentin bond strength due to modifications of the local stress distribution at the adhesive/dentin interface has been assessed. Tensile bond strength measurements for specimens with and without an adhesive flash were carried out and compared with the stress distribution at the adhesive interface determined by finite element stress analysis. The results showed that when the adhesive was constrained to the interface only, the tensile bond strength was 3.10 MPa, which increased to 6.90 MPa when a flash of adhesive was present. For a realistic measurement of dentin bond strength, the adhesive should be constrained to the interface only. Extension of the adhesive beyond the interface will result in an artificially high value for the dentin bond strength. A standardized method for the measurement of dentin bond strength is urgently needed, but must take these as well as all other known factors into account if results from different testing centers are to be directly comparable.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J. De Munck, K. Van Landuyt, M. Peumans, A. Poitevin, P. Lambrechts, M. Braem, and B. Van Meerbeek
A Critical Review of the Durability of Adhesion to Tooth Tissue: Methods and Results
J. Dent. Res., February 1, 2005; 84(2): 118 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1991 Institutional Access Guidelines