JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Creugers, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Van 't Hof, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Creugers, N. H.
Right arrow Articles by Van 't Hof, M. A.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 70, 146-149, Copyright © 1991 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

An analysis of clinical studies on resin-bonded bridges

N. H. Creugers and M. A. Van 't Hof
Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Many clinical data on resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) have been published in the last ten years. The survival rates vary widely, and the conclusions are sometimes conflicting. A method of combining the results of different studies in order to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of therapeutic concepts is meta-analysis. The aims of the meta-analysis in this study were: (1) to assess an "overall" survival ratio for RBBs and (2) to explore relationships between potential success factors and reported survival times. About 60 publications with clinical data on RBBs were reviewed. Following a number of inclusion criteria (information adequate to calculate or assess survival rates, as well as adequate information about the patients, the designs, and types of RBBs), 16 different samples were used for this meta-analysis. A weighted multiple-regression analysis revealed no significant effects of "type of retention" and "location" on the survival percentages. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to assess overall survival in a secondary analysis with the data from all 16 samples (n = 1598). The overall survivals were: one year, 89 +/- 1%; two years, 84 +/- 1%; three years, 80 +/- 1%; and four years, 74 +/- 2%.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
J. BADER and A. ISMAIL
Survey of systematic reviews in dentistry
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2004; 135(4): 464 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
M. A. FREILICH, J. C. MEIERS, J. P. DUNCAN, K. A. ECKROTE, and A. J. GOLDBERG
Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced fixed bridges
J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2002; 133(11): 1524 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1991 Institutional Access Guidelines