JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osborne, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gale, E. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osborne, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Gale, E. N.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 1599-1601, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Relationship of restoration width, tooth position, and alloy to fracture at the margins of 13- to 14-year-old amalgams

J. W. Osborne and E. N. Gale
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262.

The effect of width of the restoration, tooth position, and amalgam type on the fracture of the margins of 13- to 14-year-old, high-copper, amalgam restorations was evaluated. The evaluation assessed 193 photographs of restorations by use of ridit analysis and a rank-ordering test. The results indicated that the width of the restoration was the predominant factor and that tooth position and the different high-copper alloys were less significant. Interactions between tooth position and width indicated that lower premolars with conservative restorations exhibited the least fracture at the margins, and upper premolars with a wide preparation exhibited the most. It is postulated that tooth deflection under mastication may play a role in long-term fracture at the margins of amalgams.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
D. B. MAHLER and J. H. ENGLE
Clinical Evaluation of Amalgam Bonding in Class I and II Restorations
J Am Dent Assoc, January 1, 2000; 131(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines