JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Killiany, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Killiany, D. M.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 1551-1554, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Periostomy and growth of the mandibular condyle in the rat

D. M. Killiany
Department of Orthodontics, St. Louis University Medical Center, Missouri 63104.

It has been shown that a release of periosteal tension may augment the growth of a long bone; however, similar experiments in the mandible have produced equivocal results. For further definition of the role of periosteal tension in the growth of the mandibular condyle, 80 young female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four equal groups: (1) sham, (2) condylotomy, (3) narrow periostomy, and (4) wide periostomy. All procedures were performed unilaterally. Lateral cephalograms, transcranial condylar radiographs, and metallic implants made possible the measurement of the actual increment of condylar growth over three post-operative periods: 0 to 14 days, 14 to 28 days, and 0 to 28 days. Analysis of covariance was performed (weight gain as the covariate) and, where overall significance was found, Turkey's HSD test was used for determination of individual group differences. Conservative, circumferential periostomy of the condylar neck as well as condylotomy failed to alter the condylar growth rate, whereas removal of a wide band of periosteum led to a small decrease. These findings suggest that, at least in the rat, periosteal tension plays only a minor role-if any-in the control of condylar/mandibular growth. Furthermore, a subsequent increase or decrease in condylar growth, in experiments that use a condylotomy model, cannot be attributed solely to a disturbance in periosteal integrity caused by the condylotomy.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines