JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herkstroter, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ten Bosch, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herkstroter, F. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ten Bosch, J. J.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 1522-1526, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Wavelength-independent microradiography: a method for non-destructive quantification of enamel and dentin mineral concentrations using polychromatic x-rays

F. M. Herkstroter and J. J. Ten Bosch
Materia Technica, State University Groningen, The Netherlands.

Wavelength-independent Microradiography (WIM), described in this paper, used polychromatic, high-energy (less than or equal to 60 kV) x-rays for determination of mineral concentrations in tooth material non-destructively. This was done with the aid of a reference step-wedge made of 94% aluminum, 6% zinc. The mass attenuation coefficient of this material has a wavelength-independent ratio to the mass attenuation coefficients of enamel and dentin. With this method, mineral concentrations of enamel and dentin samples, with a thickness up to 500 microns, were determined at 20- and at 60-kV tube voltage. The samples were demineralized for 72 and 144 h and measured again. Comparison of the data showed that mineral quantification was within 1.5%, independent of the x-rays used. Finally, these mineral concentrations--obtained from the Wavelength-independent Microradiography--were compared with measurements of the same samples by Longitudinal Microradiography. A correlation of 0.99 was found for enamel and one of 0.96 for dentin.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
M.-C.D.N.J.M. Huysmans and C. Longbottom
The Challenges of Validating Diagnostic Methods and Selecting Appropriate Gold Standards
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2004; 83(suppl_1): C48 - C52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines