JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kroeze, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Truin, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kroeze, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Truin, G. J.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 1270-1274, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Prevalence and need for replacement of amalgam and composite restorations in Dutch adults

H. J. Kroeze, A. J. Plasschaert, M. A. van 't Hof and G. J. Truin
Department of Cardiology and Endodontology, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

In 1986, the first nationwide epidemiological survey of adult oral health and attitudes to oral health care was carried out in The Netherlands. One of the aims of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and the quality (in terms of need for replacement) of amalgam and composite restorations in the Dutch adult population. A group of 600 dentate individuals, 20-44 years of age, was examined. Stratified cluster sampling included as factors age, gender, socio-economic status, and area of residence. Two additional parameters were studied: frequency of visiting a dentist and type of health insurance. Oral examinations consisted of direct (mirror and explorer) and indirect (color slides and bite-wing radiographs) observations with use of well-defined criteria. On average, 13.4 restorations per individual were present, of which 23.3% were classified as unsatisfactory. A great difference in prevalence and quality data was found among several types of restorations. Test results (ANOVA) for effects of age, gender, socio-economic status, area of residence, frequency of visiting a dentist, and insurance on the prevalence of (un)satisfactory restorations resulted nearly always in significant effects of only age and frequency of visits to a dentist. There was a tendency (p less than 0.05) for the prevalence of (un)satisfactory restorations to be higher with increasing age.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines