JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sieck, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, L. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sieck, B.
Right arrow Articles by Chow, L. C.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 1261-1265, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Assessment of loosely-bound and firmly-bound fluoride uptake by tooth enamel from topically applied fluoride treatments

B. Sieck, S. Takagi and L. C. Chow
American Dental Association Health Foundation, Paffenbarger Research Center, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899.

The amounts of loosely-bound fluoride (F) deposited on human enamel by two topical F treatments were measured with use of a constant-composition F washing method. Enamel biopsies conducted before treatment and after the washing were used for determination of the firmly-bound F uptake. The results showed that (1) the washing system did not remove F from untreated enamel surface, (2) a four-minute application of an acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel deposited 27.2 (2.4) (mean, S.E.) micrograms of loosely-bound F per cm2 of enamel surface and 186 (111) ppm of firmly-bound F in the outer 10 microns of enamel, and (3) a four-minute application of a pH-2.1 dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD)-forming solution followed by APF produced 44.9 (3.1) micrograms/cm2 of loosely-bound F and 1280 (354) ppm of firmly-bound F in the outer 10 microns of enamel. The results showed that the DCPD pre-treatment effectively enhanced the enamel reactivity with F, so that the DCPD-APF treated enamel acquired greater amounts of both loosely-bound F and firmly-bound F than did samples treated with APF alone.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines