JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Svanberg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Orstavik, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Svanberg, M.
Right arrow Articles by Orstavik, D.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 861-864, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations

M. Svanberg, I. A. Mjor and D. Orstavik
NIOM-Scandinavian Institute of Dental Materials, Haslum, Norway.

Levels of mutans streptococci in plaque samples from margins of Class II amalgam (Dispersalloy), composite (P-10), and glass-ionomer (Ketac Silver) restorations were compared. Fifty-one children, each having one of the restorations in a permanent first molar, were part of an inter-individual comparison, giving 17 restorations of each material. The age of the children, the age of the restorations, and the salivary levels of mutans streptococci were comparable in the three groups. Another seven children--each having both a composite and a glass-ionomer restoration of the same age placed on contralateral premolar or molar teeth--were part of an intra-individual comparison. The percentage mutans streptococci of total CFU count in plaque was higher on composite (mean 13.7) and amalgam (mean 4.3) than on glass-ionomer (mean 1.1) restorations in the inter-individual comparison, and higher on composite (mean 4.2) than on glass-ionomer (mean 0.4) restorations in the intra-individual comparison. In both comparisons, the differences in values between samples from glass-ionomer restorations and samples from composite or amalgam restorations were statistically significant (p less than 0.05).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
E. Davidovich, E. Weiss, A. B. Fuks, and N. Beyth
Surface antibacterial properties of glass ionomer cements used in atraumatic restorative treatment
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2007; 138(10): 1347 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
M. Y. H. Chin, H. J. Busscher, R. Evans, J. Noar, and J. Pratten
Early biofilm formation and the effects of antimicrobial agents on orthodontic bonding materials in a parallel plate flow chamber
Eur J Orthod, February 1, 2006; 28(1): 1 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
I. A. MJOR
Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries
J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2005; 136(10): 1426 - 1433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J OrthodHome page
S. Malkoc, A. Demir, A. Sengun, and F. Ozer
The effect on shear bond strength of different antimicrobial agents after acid etching
Eur J Orthod, October 1, 2005; 27(5): 484 - 488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines