JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soderholm, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soderholm, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, M. J.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 1812-1816, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Influence of water exposure on the tensile strength of composites

K. J. Soderholm and M. J. Roberts
Department of Dental Biomaterials, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

The objective of this study was to investigate whether water storage causes permanent damage to composites by determining how the tensile strength of nine different composite materials changes with both water storage and water storage followed by dehydration. Eighteen samples (ASTM-D Specification 1708-66) of each of the nine materials were prepared and divided into three groups of six samples each. Group I was stored dry at 60 degrees C, while Groups II and III were stored in distilled water at 60 degrees C. After six months, Groups I and II were subjected to tensile testing, while Group III was transferred to a desiccator and dehydrated for two weeks at 60 degrees C before this group was tested in tension. Mean values, pooled by storage group independent of material, revealed a significant (p less than 0.05) reduction in strength for both Groups II and III relative to Group I. These findings prove that water has an irreversible effect on most dental composites. A comparison of Group II with Group III data revealed that the samples which were aged in water and tested (Group II) were significantly (p less than 0.05) weaker than the dehydrated samples (Group III). However, some products within Group III did not show any tendency to recover their strength after dehydration.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
J.L. Drummond
Degradation, Fatigue, and Failure of Resin Dental Composite Materials
J. Dent. Res., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 710 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Composite MaterialsHome page
Influence of Food Simulating Solutions on the Hardness of Composite Resins
Journal of Composite Materials, January 1, 2008; 42(1): 69 - 75.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines