JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Falkler, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McMahon, K. T.
Right arrow Articles by Falkler, W. A., Jr

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 69, 55-59, Copyright © 1990 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Comparative microbiological and immunological studies of subgingival dental plaque from man and baboons

K. T. McMahon, M. O. Wasfy, W. P. Yonushonis, G. E. Minah and W. A. Falkler Jr
Dental Research Department, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 3, Cairo, Egypt.

Baboons may be useful as animal models for the study of human oral diseases and infections. They are closely related to man anatomically, physiologically, and phylogenetically. Plaque and gingival indices were relatively low in 18 baboons (Papio anubis). The mean scores ranged between 0.62 +/- 0.29 and 0.37 +/- 0.20, respectively. Gram-positive and Gram-negative cocci comprised 27.0 +/- 32.4 and 3.1 +/- 7.5% of the total viable counts in the dental plaque samples. Black-pigmented Bacteroides formed about 1.9 +/- 5.9% of the bacterial population in the samples. Anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli were found in 73.2% of the samples and averaged 19.2 +/- 26.3% of the total recovered flora. Species of the oral Actinomyces and other Gram-positive rods found in humans were not isolated. The composition of the oral flora in baboons appeared to be significantly different from that of man. Isolates of F. nucleatum, L. buccalis, and B. intermedius from the two mammals were biochemically similar, but were distinguishable by analysis with antibody, both by precipitin lines and/or differences between homologous and heterologous titers.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1990 Institutional Access Guidelines