JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Head, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Head, T. W.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 68, 1210-1213, Copyright © 1989 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

A clinical trial of intraligamentary anesthesia

R. W. Edwards and T. W. Head
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, PQ, Canada.

The effectiveness of the periodontal ligament injection in providing anesthesia for routine extractions and the possible mechanisms of action of the periodontal ligament injection in producing dental anesthesia were investigated in a clinical trial. Periodontal ligament injections were administered under strong pressure with lidocaine on 14 teeth, with epinephrine on seven teeth, and with normal saline on another seven teeth. The anesthesia attained was evaluated by: response of the teeth to an electric pulp tester, gingival probing around the teeth, and the ability for teeth to be extracted without pain. The results demonstrated that periodontal ligament injections with lidocaine were effective in providing adequate anesthesia for the performance of dental extractions. Lidocaine periodontal ligament injections were statistically and clinically more effective in attaining anesthesia than were epinephrine or saline injections. Epinephrine periodontal ligament injections resulted in a slight but statistically significant increase in the stimulus necessary to produce a patient response, when the teeth were stimulated with an electric pulp-tester. Saline injections produced no change in response to the stimulus tested. It appears, based on the results of the saline and epinephrine injections, that hydrostatic pressure had no direct effect on the production of anesthesia with the periodontal ligament injection.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1989 Institutional Access Guidelines