JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fricton, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, G. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fricton, J. R.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 68, 826-829, Copyright © 1989 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Clinical vs. arthrographic diagnosis of TMJ internal derangement

G. C. Anderson, E. L. Schiffman, K. P. Schellhas and J. R. Fricton
TMJ and Craniofacial Pain Clinic, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) have gained increased recognition as a potential source of pain and dysfunction of the masticatory system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of clinicians in predicting an arthrographic diagnosis of articular disc position in a typical patient population presenting for TMJ arthrographic evaluation. Two clinicians utilized a brief history, clinical examination (including evaluation of mandibular movement and TMJ auscultation), and tomographic TMJ imaging in evaluating 60 patients. The radiologist subsequently performed the arthrographic procedures on 102 TMJs (18 unilateral and 42 bilateral). Diagnostic agreement was determined for all possible diagnostic categories including: normal disc position, TMJ internal derangement with reduction, TMJ internal derangement without reduction/acute, TMJ internal derangement without reduction/chronic, and osteoarthrosis. The significance of the diagnostic agreement between the clinicians and arthrography was evaluated with a Kappa Statistical Test, which showed good reliability. For epidemiological studies, it was concluded that clinical and tomographic evaluation would provide sufficient reliability for determination of the presence and stage of TMJ internal derangement. However, in a specific clinical situation, a difficult diagnostic problem may require the use of arthrography, depending on the impact of the diagnosis on subsequent treatment decisions.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. Emshoff, S. Jank, S. Bertram, A. Rudisch, and G. Bodner
Disk Displacement of the Temporomandibular Joint: Sonography Versus MR Imaging
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2002; 178(6): 1557 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
R. EMSHOFF, I. BRANDLMAIER, S. BERTRAM, and A. RUDISCH
Comparing methods for diagnosing temporomandibular joint disk displacement without reduction
J Am Dent Assoc, April 1, 2002; 133(4): 442 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
S. BERTRAM, A. RUDISCH, K. INNERHOFER, E. PUMPEL, G. GRUB-WIESER, and R. EMSHOFF
Diagnosing TMJ internal derangement and osteoarthritis with magnetic resonance imaging
J Am Dent Assoc, June 1, 2001; 132(6): 753 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1989 Institutional Access Guidelines