JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Felton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, C. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Felton, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, C. F.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 68, 491-495, Copyright © 1989 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment

D. Felton, G. Bergenholtz and C. F. Cox
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, University of North Carolina, School of Dentistry 27599-7450.

The purpose of this investigation was to test in five adult monkeys the effects of a glutaraldehyde-containing dentin bonding agent, GLUMA, on bacterial colonization in Class V cavities restored with composite resin. Experimental groups consisted of immediate placement of GLUMA and composite resin as well as placement of GLUMA or Scotchbond (control) in acid-etched cavities that had been left open to the oral environment for 48 hours. Various procedures for pretreatment of the cavities were included. Tissue specimens were prepared for light microscopy for observation of bacterial presence and pulp tissue reactions after eight days and 90 days. Bacteria were not detected in any of the 54 cavities treated with GLUMA regardless of observation period or use of enamel-etching procedure prior to placement of composite resin. When cavities were restored with composite resin without prior GLUMA pretreatment or with Scotchbond, bacteria were present under the majority of restorations at both time intervals. Pulpal inflammation of varying extent and character was seen after eight days in teeth that had been previously infected. At 90 days, pulps showed repair and healing regardless of treatment protocol. Data indicate that GLUMA has a distinct in vivo antibacterial effect that seems to prevent bacterial growth in tooth/restoration interfaces.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1989 Institutional Access Guidelines