Journal of Dental Research, Vol 67, 802-806, Copyright © 1988 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Dental caries, fluorosis, and fluoride exposure in Michigan schoolchildren

S. M. Szpunar and B. A. Burt
School of Public Health II, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

This study relates the prevalence of caries and fluorosis among Michigan children, residing in four different areas, to the various concentrations of F in the communities' water supplies. Demographic information, details of F history, and dental attendance data were collected by a questionnaire form filled out by parents. Children ages six to 12 were screened for caries by means of the NIDR criteria and for fluorosis by means of the TSIF index. Results pertain only to continuous residents and the permanent dentition. The prevalence of both caries and fluorosis was significantly associated with the F concentration in the community water supply. Approximately 65% of all children were caries-free, ranging from 55.1% in fluoride-deficient Cadillac to 73.7% in Redford (1.0 ppm F). About 36% of all children had dental fluorosis, ranging from 12.2 in Cadillac to 51.2 in Richmond (1.2 ppm). All of the fluorosis was very mild. From logistic regression, the prevalence of caries was significantly associated with age, dental attendance, and the use of a water supply fluoridated at 1.0 ppm. The odds of experiencing fluorosis increased at every F level above the baseline (Cadillac), with the use of topical F rinses, and with age. Results suggest that children in the four communities may be ingesting a similar level of F from sources such as dentifrices, dietary supplements, and professional applications, but the factor that differentiates them with respect to the prevalence of caries and fluorosis is the F concentration in the community water supply.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P.G.F. VIEIRA, H. P. LAWRENCE, H. LIMEBACK, F. C. SAMPAIO, and M. GRYNPAS A visual analog scale for measuring dental fluorosis severity J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2005; 136(7): 895 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. D. BELTRAN-AGUILAR, S. O. GRIFFIN, and S. A. LOCKWOOD Prevalence and trends in enamel fluorosis in the United States from the 1930s to the 1980s J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2002; 133(2): 157 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.W. Bawden, M.A. Crenshaw, J.T. Wright, and R.Z. LeGeros Consideration of Possible Biologic Mechanisms of Fluorosis Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 1995; 74(7): 1349 - 1352. [PDF]

				R.G. Rozier Epidemiologic Indices for Measuring the Clinical Manifestations of Dental Fluorosis: Overview and Critique Advances in Dental Research, June 1, 1994; 8(1): 39 - 55. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D.T.Y. Pang, C.L. Phillips, and J.W. Bawden Fluoride Intake from Beverage Consumption in a Sample of North Carolina Children Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 1992; 71(7): 1382 - 1388. [PDF]

				B.A. Burt The Changing Patterns of Systemic Fluoride Intake Journal of Dental Research, May 1, 1992; 71(5): 1228 - 1237. [PDF]

				E. Newbrun Current Regulations and Recommendations Concerning Water Fluoridation, Fluoride Supplements, and Topical Fluoride Agents Journal of Dental Research, May 1, 1992; 71(5): 1255 - 1265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P.J. Riordan and J.A. Banks Dental Fluorosis and Fluoride Exposure in Western Australia Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 1991; 70(7): 1022 - 1028. [PDF]

				P.J. Riordan Dental Caries and Fluoride Exposure in Western Australia Journal of Dental Research, July 1, 1991; 70(7): 1029 - 1034. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. S. Kaminsky, M. C. Mahoney, J. Leach, J. Melius, and M. Jo Miller Fluoride: Benefits And Risks of Exposure Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, January 1, 1990; 1(4): 261 - 281. [Full Text] [PDF]