JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darbyshire, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Darbyshire, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Douglas, W. H.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 67, 585-587, Copyright © 1988 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Microleakage in class II composite restorations bonded to dentin using thermal and load cycling

P. A. Darbyshire, L. B. Messer and W. H. Douglas
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

The effectiveness of a dentin-bonding agent (DBA) and a glass-ionomer cement liner (GIC) in reducing the marginal microleakage at the cervical margin of Class II posterior composite restorations was examined. The effect of load cycling on microleakage of this type of restoration was evaluated. The Class II cavities were prepared in extracted human pre-molar teeth, with the cervical margins finished approximately 1 mm below the CEJ. Combinations of DBA, GIC, and control (no liner) were used as mediators between resin and dentin. All restorations were placed incrementally with a 40-second cure per increment and finished with high-speed diamond burs. Half the samples of each treatment group received cyclical axial loading and half did not. All samples were thermocycled at 5 degrees and 55 degrees C for 500 cycles of one min each, stained (four hr) in 50% AgNO3, and sectioned following stain development. Microleakage was scored linearly along the dentin-restoration interface. All restorations exhibited microleakage which was unaffected by load cycling. Both the DBA and the GIC significantly reduced microleakage independently. When GIC was present, the additional presence of the DBA did not provide a statistically significant additional reduction of microleakage.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1988 Institutional Access Guidelines