JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weerkamp, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Busscher, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weerkamp, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Busscher, H. J.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 67, 1483-1487, Copyright © 1988 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Effect of zeta potential and surface energy on bacterial adhesion to uncoated and saliva-coated human enamel and dentin

A. H. Weerkamp, H. M. Uyen and H. J. Busscher
Dental School, University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

Physicochemical surface characteristics of early plaque-forming bacteria and of human tooth surfaces were measured to establish their role in bacterial adhesion to intact dental tissue slabs. In addition, the influence of an experimental salivary pellicle was evaluated. Strains of S. mutans, S. sanguis, S. salivarius, A. viscosus, and A. odontolyticus showed relatively high surface free energies (range, 99-128 mJ.m-2) and carried a negative surface charge, at both physiological (mu = 0.057) and low (mu = 0.020) ionic strengths of the medium. Very large differences in hydrophobicity were detected when the hexadecane adsorption test was used for measurement. Powdered enamel and dentin were also negatively charged at low ionic strength but were slightly positively charged in the physiological buffer. The surface free energy of enamel and dentin increased upon saliva coating, whereas the surface charge was always negative. The adhesion experiments showed: (1) large differences in the binding of various bacteria to the same surface; (2) an up to 20-fold difference in the binding of the same bacterium to different surfaces, although the binding of some strains was relatively independent of the type of surface or presence of a salivary pellicle; (3) a significant decrease in adhesion when the ionic strength of the medium was lowered, due to increased electrostatic repulsion (however, the adhesion of some bacteria was independent of the ionic strength of the medium); (4) different time-dependent adherence kinetics, depending on both the bacteria and nature of the solid surface; and (5) a propensity for plaque streptococci to bind to uncoated dentin.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S.C. Venegas, J.M. Palacios, M.C. Apella, P.J. Morando, and M.A. Blesa
Calcium Modulates Interactions between Bacteria and Hydroxyapatite.
J. Dent. Res., December 1, 2006; 85(12): 1124 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible PolymersHome page
A. Y. Rad, H. Ayhan, and E. Piskin
Adhesion of Different Bacterial Strains to Low-Temperature Plasma Treated Biomedical Silicon Catheter Surfaces
Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers, April 1, 1998; 13(2): 81 - 101.
[Abstract]


Home page
J Biomater ApplHome page
A. D. Cook, R. D. Sagers, and W. G. Pitt
Bacterial Adhesion to Protein-Coated Hydrogels
J Biomater Appl, January 1, 1993; 8(1): 72 - 89.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1988 Institutional Access Guidelines