JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steller, M.
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, T. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steller, M.
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, T. E.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 67, 1334-1337, Copyright © 1988 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Electrical stimulation of salivary flow in patients with Sjogren's syndrome

M. Steller, L. Chou and T. E. Daniels
Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0512.

Patients with the salivary component of Sjogren's syndrome (SS) develop chronic xerostomia, which causes oral symptoms and functional impairment in approximate proportion to its severity. The purpose of this double-blind study was to determine whether an electrical stimulus applied to the tongue and hard palate by a battery-operated device (SAL II, Biosonics, Inc.) could stimulate salivary flow in subjects with generally severe SS. Twenty-nine patients with the salivary component of SS (diagnosed as the presence of focal chronic sialadenitis in a labial salivary gland biopsy specimen with a focus score of greater than 1 focus/4 mm2) were randomly assigned active or placebo devices, which they used for three minutes, three times a day for four weeks. Whole saliva flow rates were measured at weeks 0, 2, and 4 by collection of whole saliva both before and after stimulation with the device. Twenty-four subjects completed the study. The change in mean post-stimulation flow rate from week 0 to week 4 was greater for the 13 subjects using an active device (0.08 +/- S.D. 0.08 g/2 min, to 0.24 +/- 0.33 g/2 min) than for the 11 subjects using a placebo device (0.11 +/- 0.15 g/2 min, to 0.08 +/- 0.18 g/2 min) (p = 0.04). However, the magnitude of the mean difference was small, because three subjects using active devices responded and others did not. Only five subjects, all using active devices, reported a subjective increase in the amount of their saliva. The results of this study indicate that some SS patients with residual salivary flow show a significant response to electrical stimulation, but others with low or absent whole saliva flow rates do not respond.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S.A. Mathews, B.T. Kurien, and R.H. Scofield
Oral Manifestations of Sjogren's Syndrome
J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2008; 87(4): 308 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1988 Institutional Access Guidelines