JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moncla, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moncla, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, M. C.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 67, 1267-1270, Copyright © 1988 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

The use of whole-cell DNA probes for the identification of Bacteroides intermedius isolates in a dot blot assay

B. J. Moncla, L. Strockbine, P. Braham, J. Karlinsey and M. C. Roberts
Department of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

Bacteroides intermedius includes two distinct groups of organisms that are phenotypically indistinguishable by conventional methods. These two groups are represented by the type strain of the species ATCC 25611T (B. intermedius type I) and by ATCC 33563 (B. intermedius type II). Members of each group can be distinguished from each other by analysis of the cellular protein composition by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and by DNA-DNA homology studies, because they share less than 40% homology. The purpose of this study was to prepare specific DNA probes for the two groups of Bacteroides intermedius and to test them against field isolates. Whole-cell DNA probes were prepared from B. intermedius types I and II and tested against 253 field strains of Bacteroides which had been identified by conventional phenotypic tests as B. intermedius. Of these, 170 (67%) hybridized with the B. intermedius type I DNA probe, 28 (11%) with the type II, and 23 (9%) failed to react with the B. intermedius probes but did hybridize with either B. melaninogenicus, B. loescheii, or B. corporis whole-cell DNA probes. The 32 (13%) remaining isolates failed to hybridize with any of the five Bacteroides probes or with probes to B. asaccharolyticus, B. buccae, B. buccalis, B. denticola, B. gingivalis, B. oralis, or B. oris. These data demonstrate the usefulness of whole-cell DNA probes for the identification of phenotypically similar or identical field isolates.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
R. Gmur and T. Thurnheer
Direct quantitative differentiation between Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens in clinical specimens
Microbiology, May 1, 2002; 148(5): 1379 - 1387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
T. Premaraj, N. Kato, K. Fukui, H. Kato, and K. Watanabe
Use of PCR and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Techniques for Differentiation of Prevotella intermedia Sensu Stricto and Prevotella nigrescens
J. Clin. Microbiol., April 1, 1999; 37(4): 1057 - 1061.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1988 Institutional Access Guidelines