JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Firestone, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Warrick, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Firestone, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Warrick, J.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 67, 44-45, Copyright © 1988 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Comparison of two scoring methods for root surface caries in hamsters

A. R. Firestone, F. F. Feagin, C. N. Graves, G. K. Stookey, C. Rodlun and J. Warrick
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham 35294, USA.

The aim of this investigation was to compare two methods of scoring root surface caries in hamster teeth. The experimental material was mandibles from hamsters which had been infected with Actinomyces viscosus, fed a caries-promoting diet, and received either 0, 1, 10, or 25 ppm fluoride in the drinking water during an 18-week experimental period (Stookey, 1986). Root surface caries on the lingual surfaces of mandibular first molars was scored according to the grid method of Doff et al. (1977) and by the quantitative planimetric method of Firestone et al. (1986). Data from both methods confirmed that 25 and 10 ppm fluoride were significantly more caries-inhibitory than 1 ppm fluoride, which, in turn, significantly reduced root surface caries compared with the 0 ppm control group. Correlation coefficients for caries scores (0.92) and ranking of the scores (0.88) for each animal between the two methods were highly significant (p < 0.0001). The planimetric measurement of root surface caries in hamsters was as sensitive as the grid-scoring method.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
fake Adv Dent ResHome page
C.W. Fairhurst
Dental Ceramics: the State of the Science
Advances in Dental Research, September 1, 1992; 6(1): 78 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
FAKE JDRHome page
A.R. Firestone, C.N. Graves, and F.F. Feagin
The Effects of Different Levels of Dietary Sucrose on Root Caries subsequent to Gingivectomy in Conventional Rats Infected with Actinomyces viscosus M-100
Journal of Dental Research, October 1, 1988; 67(10): 1342 - 1345.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1988 Institutional Access Guidelines