JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antczak-Bouckoms, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antczak-Bouckoms, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weinstein, M. C.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 66, 1630-1635, Copyright © 1987 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Cost-effectiveness analysis of periodontal disease control

A. A. Antczak-Bouckoms and M. C. Weinstein
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate alternative methods of periodontal disease control. The alternatives considered included non-surgical and surgical procedures as well as the use of antimicrobial agents. Data on costs were obtained from American Dental Association publications of average charges for periodontal services. The concept of quality-adjusted tooth-years (QATYs) was developed to provide an outcome measure which could be compared across treatments. The conclusions of this analysis are as follows: (1) Conservative non-surgical treatments for periodontal disease control not only have costs lower than surgical alternatives, as would be expected, but also maximize expected quality-adjusted tooth-years over a wide range of estimates; (2) antimicrobial therapy used as an adjunct to non-surgical treatment is likely to be both effective and cost-effective; and (3) quality of tooth-years is a critical consideration in the determination of outcome of periodontal treatment. For example, when tooth-years are not adjusted for quality, differences between treatments are diminished, and surgical treatment becomes as good as or better than more conservative treatments for some levels of disease severity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Dent. Res.Home page
S. Birch and A.I. Ismail
Patient Preferences and the Measurement of Utilities in the Evaluation of Dental Technologies
J. Dent. Res., July 1, 2002; 81(7): 446 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
C. J. HENKE, R. J. GENCO, W. J. KILLOY, D. P. MILLER, C. J. EVANS, and R. D. FINKELMAN
An economic evaluation of a chlorhexidine chip for treating chronic periodontitis: The CHIP (CHlorhexidine In Periodontitis) study
J Am Dent Assoc, November 1, 2001; 132(11): 1557 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1987 Institutional Access Guidelines