JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dahan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Boitte, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dahan, J.
Right arrow Articles by Boitte, C.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 65, 441-447, Copyright © 1986 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Comparison of the reproducibility of EMG signals recorded from human masseter and lateral pterygoid muscles

J. Dahan and C. Boitte

EMG recordings of the left and right masseter and lateral pterygoid muscles were repeated three times in 15 young adults to test the reproducibility of the signals. Two tests were made on the same day (morning and afternoon) and one test three days later (morning). Needle and hook electrodes were used for the masseter muscle and needle electrodes for the lateral pterygoid muscle. The superficial areas of recording were tattooed on the skin. An intra-oral approach was selected for the lateral pterygoid muscle. The subjects were asked to perform three definite tasks for the masseter muscle (intercuspid occlusion, maximum protrusion, and centric relation with a bite opening of 3mm) and two for the pterygoid muscle (maximum opening and maximum protrusion). The EMG signals were directly integrated, and root mean squares of the AC components were computed. The selection of the signals to discard possible artefacts was performed by displaying EMG and RMS outputs on a six-channel UV oscillograph. The selected RMS values were submitted to different analyses of variance to define additive and non-additive models of effects. The results may be summarized as follows: The between-day sessions showed more variation than the within-day sessions. The variations related to the method accounted for a very high percentage of the total variance (48.9%). The recordings with needle electrodes displayed a large percentage of the individual variation (masseter, 31.2%; lateral pterygoid muscle, 65.9%) and significantly lower values for the variations related to the session or the side of recording. The one-side recordings were more suitable for distinguishing the biological variations than were the bilateral ones.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1986 Institutional Access Guidelines