JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wishe, H. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roy, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wishe, H. I.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 65, 1365-1370, Copyright © 1986 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Establishment of an improved implantation technique for hamster mucous membrane irritation testing

M. Roy and H. I. Wishe
Department of Histology and Cell Biology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York 10010.

Biological evaluation procedures for the acceptance of new dental materials include testing for mucous membrane irritation and inflammation, with the hamster cheek pouch used as a model system. Previous reports have indicated both a low 14-day implant retention rate and poor differentiation between positive and negative controls, requiring the establishment of a new standard procedure for hamster cheek pouch implantations. Groups of 10 female golden Syrian hamsters were implanted with uniform discs (6 mm in diameter and 1 mm thick) of white base-plate gutta percha (GP), gray welding-rod polyvinyl chloride (PVC), low-density polyethylene (LDPE), or test alloys, under Nembutal anesthesia. Each animal's right cheek pouch was everted and cleaned, and the implant was loosely placed at the bottom of the pouch. The pouch was closed by a double-suture technique. Contralateral (left) cheek pouches served as controls for the physical state of each animal. A collar (cable tie) was placed tightly around the animal's neck at a level between the sutures and the implant. Cheek pouches were assessed after 14 days. Implants were kept in contact with oral mucosa longer using the double-suture-plus-collar technique than in hamsters without collars (14-day retention rates of 48.0% and 6.7%, respectively). Average severity indices (ASI) of 5.4 and 1.7 were obtained for PVC and GP, respectively, as compared with 1.6 for contralateral control pouches. LDPE was not a suitable negative control material (ASI = 2.6). Positive and negative controls were clearly delineated when PVC and GP were the control materials.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Vet PatholHome page
Hamster check pouch--not a mucosal surface!
Vet. Pathol., November 1, 2007; 44(6): 963 - 964.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1986 Institutional Access Guidelines