Journal of Dental Research, Vol 64, 1382-1385, Copyright © 1985 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

ARTICLES

Prevalence of Legionella-specific IgG and IgM antibody in a dental clinic population

P. G. Fotos, H. N. Westfall, I. S. Snyder, R. W. Miller and B. M. Mutchler

This study was undertaken to determine the frequency of Legionella infection in a dental clinic setting. Serum samples from 270 dental clinic personnel were evaluated using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect Legionella-specific IgM and IgG antibodies. The pooled-species whole-cell-antigen preparation used in these assays was derived from six Legionella pneumophila strains and one strain each from Legionella bozemanii and Legionella micdadei. Significant levels of IgG and IgM antibodies were found in 20% and 16%, respectively, of the samples. This compares with 8% and 10%, respectively, for a randomly selected non-clinical group from the region (P less than 0.005). Samples from clinic personnel with significant IgG titers (greater than 1:128) were also evaluated for activity to each of the eight single-species antigens, with the following results: L. pneumophila, 45% (combined six strains); L. micdadei, 37%; and L. bozemanii, 18%. Comparing individuals' "years spent in the clinic environment" with the incidence of significant antibody levels strongly suggests that the risk of Legionella infection increases proportionately with increased clinic exposure time (P less than 0.05). Analysis of these data implies that Legionella may be present in the dental clinic environment, thus creating an increased risk for clinical personnel or patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H G Rees World at work: evidence-based risk management of nail dust in chiropodists and podiatrists Occup. Environ. Med., March 1, 2008; 65(3): 216 - 217. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. K. Huntington, J. F. Williams, and C. D. Mackenzie Endotoxin contamination in the dental surgery J. Med. Microbiol., September 1, 2007; 56(9): 1230 - 1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. J. Schel, P. D. Marsh, D. J. Bradshaw, M. Finney, M. R. Fulford, E. Frandsen, E. Ostergaard, J. M. ten Cate, W. R. Moorer, A. Mavridou, et al. Comparison of the Efficacies of Disinfectants To Control Microbial Contamination in Dental Unit Water Systems in General Dental Practices across the European Union Appl. Envir. Microbiol., February 1, 2006; 72(2): 1380 - 1387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Singh, O. C. Stine, D. L. Smith, J. K. Spitznagel Jr., M. E. Labib, and H. N. Williams Microbial Diversity of Biofilms in Dental Unit Water Systems Appl. Envir. Microbiol., June 1, 2003; 69(6): 3412 - 3420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. G. DEPAOLA, D. MANGAN, S. E. MILLS, W. COSTERTON, J. BARBEAU, B. SHEARER, and J. BARTLETT A review of the science regarding dental unit waterlines J Am Dent Assoc, September 1, 2002; 133(9): 1199 - 1206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. R Porter Prions and dentistry J R Soc Med, January 4, 2002; 95(4): 178 - 181. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. MILLS THE DENTAL UNIT WATERLINE CONTROVERSY: DEFUSING THE MYTHS, DEFINING THE SOLUTIONS J Am Dent Assoc, October 1, 2000; 131(10): 1427 - 1441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]