JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ranly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zislis, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ranly, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zislis, T.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 64, 1225-1228, Copyright © 1985 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

The effect of alternatives to formocresol on antigenicity of proteins

D. M. Ranly, D. Horn and T. Zislis

As part of an overall evaluation of possible substitutes for the pulpotomy agent formocresol, this study was initiated to compare the antigenicity of the reaction products of protein with formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, or dimethylsuberimidate (DMS). Rabbits were injected with rabbit serum albumin (RSA) which had been treated with one of the following solutions: phosphate-buffered saline, 2% glutaraldehyde, 4% formaldehyde, or 2% DMS. The antisera from the rabbits were analyzed for elicited antibodies by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and in a horseradish peroxidase (HRP) assay using a spot technique on nitrocellulose paper. These assays demonstrated that DMS-treated RSA was the most antigenic of the reaction products tested. The least provocative was the glutaraldehyde-treated RSA; the reaction product of formaldehyde was intermediate. Our findings suggest that if non-immunogenicity of a pulpotomy agent is a desirable property, then DMS does not meet the criteria of an alternative pulp fixative. In contrast, the relatively low antigenicity of glutaraldehyde reinforces other favorable findings which support its use clinically.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1985 Institutional Access Guidelines