|
|
||||||||
Journal of Dental Research, Vol 63, 1387-1391, Copyright © 1984 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals
ARTICLES |
A. J. Goldberg, E. Rydinge, E. A. Santucci and W. B. Racz
Two methods of evaluating the in vivo wear of posterior composite restorations are described and compared with the USPHS direct clinical evaluation system. The three methods were consistent among themselves and over the two years of the study. In order of increasing sensitivity, the methods were: USPHS, total ranking of models, and categorizing of models according to a set of standards. The last procedure identified statistically significant differences (p less than 0.05) between the composite formulations as early as the nine-month recall. All formulations experienced increasing wear with time, but at a decreasing rate.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. S. TURKUN and B. O. AKTENER Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials J Am Dent Assoc, February 1, 2001; 132(2): 196 - 203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |