JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Re, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Norling, B. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Re, G. J.
Right arrow Articles by Norling, B. K.

Journal of Dental Research, Vol 62, 997-1001, Copyright © 1983 by International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals


ARTICLES

Effect of mandibular molar anatomy on the buccal Class I cavity preparation

G. J. Re, D. Pruitt, J. M. Childers and B. K. Norling

In mandibular molars, enamel dramatically increases in thickness at the buccal pit area and progresses occlusally due to an extensive concavity in the buccal dentinal core. In order to comply with the principles of operative dentistry, this anatomic variance dictates that, if the ultimate restoration is to be placed in dentin, the axial wall of a Class I buccal pit preparation should incline medially rather than follow the external contour of the tooth. The occlusal cavosurface angle of the preparation should be obtuse to coincide with enamel rod direction. Retention, when needed, should be placed at the mesio-axial and disto-axial line angles to avoid undermining occlusal intercuspal enamel, especially as the preparation approaches 2 mm occlusal to the buccal pit.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1983 Institutional Access Guidelines