JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schutzbank, S.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schutzbank, S.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R.
J Dent Res 57 (9): 861-864,
Copyright © 1978 International & American Associations for Dental Research Online Journals

Articles

A comparative in vitro study of GK-101 and GK-101E in caries removal

SG Schutzbank, J Galaini, JH Kronman, M Goldman, and RE Clark

(1) This study indicated that both GK-101 and GK-101E exerted a statistically significant chemical action in the removal of carious material, in addition to any mechanical effects of the delivery system and applicator tip. (2) The superiority of GK-101E over saline in caries removal was noted, regardless of lesion consistency. (3) GK-101 was statistically superior to saline in caries removal in medium-hard lesions; it was not statistically superior to saline in lesions of medium consistency.




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1978 Institutional Access Guidelines