|
|
||||||||
Articles |
This paper describes a series of tests conducted to determine the effectiveness of various cooling techniques used while preparing teeth for restoration. Comparisons are presented for four cooling techniques: air stream, air-water spray, water stream from a separate hand-held syringe, and water applied through a hollow bur. The comparisons were made in two ways, temperature control and influence on cutting rate. It was demonstrated that wet cooling techniques provided better temperature control than cooling with air and also improved the rate of material removal.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. E. Murray, L. J. Windsor, T. W. Smyth, A. A. Hafez, and C. F. Cox ANALYSIS OF PULPAL REACTIONS TO RESTORATIVE PROCEDURES, MATERIALS, PULP CAPPING, AND FUTURE THERAPIES Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med., November 1, 2002; 13(6): 509 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |