JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Dent Res 51(6): 1624-1631, 1972
© 1972 International and American Associations for Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BEASLEY, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by CUTRIGHT, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BEASLEY, J. D., III
Right arrow Articles by CUTRIGHT, D. E.

Comparison of Histological Stained Sections with Culturing Techniques in the Evaluation of Contaminated Wounds

JOE D. BEASLEY III 1, ARTHUR GROSS 1, and DUANE E. CUTRIGHT 1

1 Experimental Pathology Service, Division of Oral Pathology and Department of Microbiology, Division of Oral Biology, US Army Institute of Dental Research, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20012, USA

Three methods of evaluating contaminated wounds were studied and compared in 80 albino rats. No absolute degree of reliability can be obtained with any one of the three methods, but a combination of methods plus certain clinical data may yield possible qualitative and quantitative information.

Submitted on September 7, 1971






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1972 Institutional Access Guidelines