JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 49(2): 428-434, 1970
© 1970 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by EDEN, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by PEYTON, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by EDEN, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by PEYTON, F. A.

Evaluation of a Tensile Test for Direct Filling Resins

G. T. EDEN 1, R. G. CRAIG 1, and F. A. PEYTON 1

1 University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

A test method intended to measure the bond strengths of filling resin-dental substrate combinations under tensile loading has been evaluated and modified so that it is capable of statistically ranking the bonding abilities of commercially available dental resins. The test method is simple and inexpensive with demonstrated reliability. It should fill a need that currently exists for a test method to evaluate adhesive dental resins.

Dental substrates that served as model adherents were bovine enamel and bovine dentin. The sensitivity of the test proved adequate in discriminating among the bonding abilities of the five typical commercial resins to both substrates when they had been freshly surfaced and also when they had been etched with citric acid. Adhesion to enamel increased, on the average, over 200% after a citric acid etch. Adhesion to freshly surfaced dentin, which was minimal or nonexistent except for the carbohydrate cement, increased slightly after a citric acid etch.

The rank order of bond strengths was different for each substrate and was further altered by etching the surface of each substrate so that no single resin performed best under all conditions.

Submitted on May 16, 1969







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1970 Institutional Access Guidelines