JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 46(1): 35-45, 1967
© 1967 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRUDEVOLD, F.
Right arrow Articles by COKLICA, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by BRUDEVOLD, F.
Right arrow Articles by COKLICA, V.

The Chemistry of Caries Inhibition Problems and Challenges in Topical Treatments

FINN BRUDEVOLD 1, HAROLD G. McCANN 1, ROLF NILSSON 1, BASIL RICHARDSON 1, and VERA COKLICA 1

1 Forsyth Dental Center and Harvard University School of Dental Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Evidence has been presented in support of the view that the effectiveness of known topical agents is dependent on their ability to deposit F as fluorapatite in the surface enamel. Stannous tin depresses the deposition of F, and there is no indication that presence of tin compounds in enamel increases caries resistance. A portion of the F acquired during topical treatments leaches away during the first few hours. The lost F represents unreacted F and CaF2. The retained F appears to be present as fluorapatite and is permanently fixed due to super-saturation of saliva in respect to fluorapatite. Several coating materials applied to the enamel immediately after topical treatments have been shown to noticeably increase the amount of retained fluoride after 24 hours. The clinical significance of this finding is discussed.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1967 Institutional Access Guidelines