JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 44(4): 756-762, 1965
© 1965 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CRAIG, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by PEYTON, F. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CRAIG, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by PEYTON, F. A.

Measurement of Stresses in Fixed-Bridge Restorations Using a Brittle Coating Technique

R. G. CRAIG 1 and F. A. PEYTON 1

1 School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

The magnitude and direction of strains and stresses were determined on fixed-bridge restorations, using a brittle lacquer-coating technique. A maxillary anterior six-unit bridge having pin-ledge preparations on the cuspids, a mandibular anterior six-unit bridge having frac34-crowns on the cuspids and a see figure in pdf four-unit maxillary bridge having a frac34-crown and full crown on the first biscuspid and second molar, respectively, were used in the study.

The maxillary and mandibular anterior bridges were loaded on the incisal edge and were shown to deflect downward and to tip forward during loading. The two anterior bridges, therefore, when loaded sustained tensile strains in a vertical direction on the lingual aspect and in a horizontal direction on the labial aspect. The pin-ledge preparations were not particularly satisfactory, since often the cement failed at the abutments during loading. The frac34-crown preparation appeared to be more suitable, since the mandibular bridge having these preparations withstood loading up to 60 pounds. The posterior bridge when loaded deflected in a typical transverse manner, since little if any tipping occurred. The stress and direction of the strain were found to be a function of load, position of the force application, and mass and shape of the restoration.

Submitted on May 26, 1964







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1965 Institutional Access Guidelines