JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 43(4): 528-535, 1964
© 1964 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SYLVESTER, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by HUNT, H. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SYLVESTER, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by HUNT, H. R.

A Comparison of Certain Properties from Specific Major Salivary Glands of Caries-resistant and Caries-susceptible Rats

C. J. SYLVESTER 1, S. ROSEN 1, C. A. HOPPERT 1, and H. R. HUNT 1

1 Departments of Microbiology and Public Health, Zoology, and Chemistry, Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Whole, parotid, and submaxillary-sublingual salivas from caries-resistant and caries-susceptible rats were analyzed for amylase activity, relative viscosity, rate of flow, pH, and buffering capacity.

More than 99 per cent of the amylase activity of saliva originated in the parotid glands of these animals. Parotid and whole salivas from susceptible rats showed greater amylase activity than these salivas from resistant rats.

When the various salivas were collected at room temperature, whole and submaxillary-sublingual salivas from resistant rats were more viscous than these salivas from susceptible rats. When whole saliva was collected in tubes submerged in ice, the difference between resistants and susceptibles was no longer observed. There was no difference in the relative viscosity in the parotid secretions between the two lines of rats. Comparison of salivas within the lines of rats showed that parotid saliva was less viscous than submaxillary-sublingual saliva, whereas whole saliva gave intermediate values.

The mean rate of flow and pH of the parotid, submaxillary-sublingual, and whole secretions were not essentially different in resistant and susceptible rats. Within each line of rats, however, the rate of flow of each saliva differed. Whole saliva from unoperated rats showed the greatest flow rate—parotid saliva was slowest and submaxillary-sublingual saliva was intermediate.

Buffering capacity, determined by titratable alkalinity, was significantly greater in susceptible than in resistant whole and submaxillary-sublingual salivas.

Submitted on July 10, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1964 Institutional Access Guidelines