JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 43(3): 412-422, 1964
© 1964 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NEIDLE, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by LIEBMAN, F. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NEIDLE, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by LIEBMAN, F. M.

Effects of Vasoactive Drugs and Nerve Stimulation on Blood Flow in the Tooth Pulp and Allied Structures of the Cat

ENID A. NEIDLE 1 and FREDERICK M. LIEBMAN 1

1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, New York

The electrical impedance technique for investigating blood flow in the tooth pulp and associated dental structures has been described, and the results of experiments with over fifty cats have been reported. Experiments with the vasopressor drug epinephrine, administered both locally and systemically, clearly indicated that this drug is capable of altering mandibular and pulpal blood flow, with or without concomitant change in systemic pressure. Amyl nitrite, isoproterenol, and methacholine were the vasodepressor drugs employed in this study. Comparison of the results obtained with these drugs indicated that changes in local resistance and arterial pressure, the latter produced by changes in cardiac output and cardiac rate, influence the direction of blood-flow change in the pulp and related structures. Stimulation of the peripheral end of the cervical sympathetic nerve caused a reduction in blood flow in the tooth pulp and ear, with no significant charge in mandibular blood flow. Marked increase in intensity of stimulation resulted in some experiments in a small decrease in mandibular flow.

Submitted on May 27, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1964 Institutional Access Guidelines