JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 43(3): 380-401, 1964
© 1964 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GOAZ, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by MILLER, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GOAZ, P. W.
Right arrow Articles by MILLER, M. C., III

On the Addition of a Variable to a Previously Optimized System for the Measurement of the Nitrate-Nitrite Reductase Activity in Salivary Sediment

PAUL W. GOAZ 1, HELEN A. BISWELL 1, and M. CLINTON MILLER III 1

1 Dental Section, Oklahoma Medical Research Institute, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

In this study an attempt was made to add a fourth variable to a previously optimized system, dependent upon three independent variables. Two techniques, the method of steepest ascent and the one-factor-at-a-time procedure, were utilized. The one-factor-at-a-time method was used initially for an estimation of the optimal level of the fourth variable. It was used again when it became apparent that the temperature effect was overriding the effect of substrate concentration in the system. The method of steepest ascent was utilized for the interim investigations. The results of this study provided the most practical conditions of temperature (37° C.), pH (7.38), electron donor (1.024 mg. yeast extract/ml) and substrate concentration (18 µg. NO-3/ml) under which salivary nitrate-nitrite reductase activity can be measured in a clinical study.

In addition this investigation illustrates how a purely mechanical application of the method of steepest ascent can lead to the development of erroneous conclusions. A number of circumstances such as, when the system being optimized is very delicately balanced, when the optimum region is a broad plateau, when one independent variable causes a more striking effect than the others, when in the final analysis of the central composite design a non-negative coefficient for a quadratic term occurs in the fitted model, and inattention to an observation that is in conflict with the prediction equation, and/or the experimenter's expectations are some of the circumstances that can occasion (or signal) such (pending) difficulties.

Submitted on May 10, 1963







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1964 Institutional Access Guidelines