JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 41(6): 1340-1348, 1962
© 1962 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SAMACHSON, J.
Right arrow Articles by LEDERER, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SAMACHSON, J.
Right arrow Articles by LEDERER, H.

Effect of Metal Ions on the Relative Uptake of Ca45 and Sr85 by Bone Powder in Vitro

JOSEPH SAMACHSON 1 and HILDA LEDERER 1

1 Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, Illinois, and Montefiore Hospital, New York, New York

The ratio of uptake of Ca45 to that of Sr85 by defatted bone powder in vitro was used as a parameter for the study of bone surfaces. To test the hypothesis that one difference between sites where ions exchange was the space available on the crystal surface, defatted bone powder was treated with metallic ions of different radii and then shaken with solutions containing Sr85 and Ca45. Alternatively, the metal ions were added to the same solution as the radioisotopes. Uptake was determined both with defatted bone powder and with "anorganic" bone. The ratio of Ca45/Sr85 uptake was decreased by Be++, Cu++, Co++, Ni++, Mn++, Cd++, Zn++, and Pb++, unaffected by Mg++, and increased by Ba++. Other factors also influenced the ratio, but, in general, the hypothesis suggested above appeared valid. Reproducibility of individual uptake values, but not of the ratio, was increased by more vigorous shaking.

Submitted on March 13, 1962







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1962 Institutional Access Guidelines