JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 41(4): 875-882, 1962
© 1962 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN REEN, R.
Right arrow Articles by OSTROM, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VAN REEN, R.
Right arrow Articles by OSTROM, C. A.

Effect of Dietary Phosphate Supplements on Dental Caries in the Rat

ROBERT VAN REEN 1 and CARL A. OSTROM 1

1 Dental Division, Naval Medical Research Institute, National Naval Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland

Studies were made of the effect of various dietary phosphates on the occurrence of dental caries in the NMRI-D strain of rat. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, it was found that the addition of either CaHPO4 or Na2HPO4 to a purified diet resulted in fewer carious teeth, fewer carious lesions, and a tendency for the lesions to be less severe than in the unsupplemented control rats. In Experiment 2, the results with Na2HPO4 were confirmed, and it was found that (NH4)2HP04 was also an effective cariostatic agent when added to the diet at a level equivalent to the sodium salt. On the other hand, it was demonstrated that Na4P2O7 and Na5P3O10 were not effective under our experimental conditions.

Titration curves, of aqueous preparations of the various phosphates, showed that sodium pyrophosphate had the highest pH in solution, and after reaching a pH of about 6.5, it titrated very similarly to sodium or ammonium phosphate. If the buffering capacity of the various phosphate compounds is the only mechanism of caries reduction, sodium pyrophosphate would be expected to be effective; since it was not, some possible reasons for this were discussed.

Submitted on December 26, 1961







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1962 Institutional Access Guidelines