JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 41(3): 514-524, 1962
© 1962 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HIXON, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by FLEMING, P. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HIXON, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by FLEMING, P. T.

Occlusal Status, Caries, and Mastication

ERNEST H. HIXON 1, PHILIP J. MASCHKA 1, and PAUL T. FLEMING 1

1 College of Dentistry, State University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa*

Highly reliable results were obtained in recording caries experience over a short period of time following the establishment of the judgment criteria in a pilot study. When young adults with excellent occlusions were compared with those having full-cusp malocclusions, it was found that those with malocclusions had typically experienced more caries activity. When adjustments were made for the effect of Class II dental restorations, the difference appeared to be confined to the smooth surfaces. Within a subsample of 20 cases selected because of extremely irregular proximal contacts, caries activity was significantly less on the proximal surfaces of the upper posterior teeth with irregular contacts than where the contacts of adjacent teeth had a satisfactory relationship to each other. Only in the lower anterior area did the teeth with irregular contacts show a tendency toward more caries. Individuals with full-cusp Class I and Class II malocclusions were found to pulverize peanuts less well than those with excellent occlusions. Because cusp-to-cusp interdigitations were not studied and because of the wide variability between individuals, generalization from the small but significant difference is limited.

Submitted on June 14, 1960







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1962 Institutional Access Guidelines