JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 40(5): 936-945, 1961
© 1961 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CRAIG, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, D. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CRAIG, R. G.
Right arrow Articles by JOHNSON, D. W.

Compressive Properties of Enamel, Dental Cements, and Gold

R. G. CRAIG 1, F. A. PEYTON 1, and D. W. JOHNSON 1

1 University of Michigan, School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan

The compressive properties of enamel, silicate cement, zinc phosphate cement, and dental gold were determined.

Cusp and side enamel were shown to have similar compressive properties, which were substantially higher than those for dentin.

Silicate and zinc phosphate cements were found to have compressive properties of the same order of magnitude as that determined for human dentin. The age of the specimens and the powder-to-liquid ratio affected the compressive properties of the cements.

Type I gold had a proportional limit substantially lower than tooth structure, while type IV gold, in the hardened condition, had a proportional limit considerably higher than enamel or dentin. The elastic moduli of type I or IV gold, however, were comparable to values obtained for human enamel.

The compressive properties obtained for the various materials showed that higher values were obtained for the proportional limit and compressive strength when small rather than large, specimens were utilized.

The proportional limit and compressive-strength values for enamel were found to be higher than usual when the length-to-diameter ratios of the cylindrical specimens were less than 1.3.

Submitted on August 8, 1960




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of the American Dental AssociationHome page
L. A. LITONJUA, S. ANDREANA, P. J. BUSH, T. S. TOBIAS, and R. E. COHEN
Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions: A re-evaluation
J Am Dent Assoc, July 1, 2003; 134(7): 845 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1961 Institutional Access Guidelines