JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 40(1): 3-15, 1961
© 1961 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MORRIS, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MORRIS, A. L.

Factors Influencing Experimental Carcinogenesis in the Hamster Cheek Pouch

ALVIN L. MORRIS 1

1 Department of Pathology and Division of Dental Research, University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York

1. Standardized experimental techniques for chemical carcinogenesis in the hamster cheek pouch are presented.

2. Under the conditions of the experiments described here, the tissues of the cheek pouch of old hamsters are more resistant to carcinogenic stimuli than those of young hamsters. No difference in rate of carcinogenic response is seen between the ages of 3 and 9 weeks. Five weeks appears to be the ideal age for hamsters used for experimental oral carcinogenesis from the standpoint of ease of manipulation and tumor production.

3. Five-tenths per cent concentration of 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene is the optimal concentration for the rapid production of malignant tumors in the hamster cheek pouch. This concentration produces maximum tumor response with minimum latent period, with no loss of animals due to toxicity; 0.1 per cent and 0.05 per cent concentrations will produce graded submaximal responses in tumor production.

4. A shorter latent period is required for tumor development in animals exposed to a carcinogen three times per week than in those receiving the carcinogen twice weekly. A smaller total dose is required to produce tumors in all animals when the carcinogen is applied twice each week than when given three times weekly.

5. The response of the hamsters to the repeated application of the carcinogenic hydrocarbon 9,10-dimethyl-1,2-benzanthracene is not related to the sex of the animals under the conditions of the experiments presented here.

6. Conditions of caging (three or four hamsters per cage) had no apparent effect on the experimental results obtained in the experiments reviewed here.

Submitted on July 28, 1958
Revised on September 13, 1960







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1961 Institutional Access Guidelines