JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 39(5): 947-954, 1960
© 1960 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LUDUENA, F. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LUDUENA, F. P.

Effect of Some Vasoconstrictors on Intradermal Anesthesia

F. P. LUDUENA 1

1 Pharmacology Section, Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensselaer, New York

Intradermal anesthetic activity and duration of anesthesia were determined in guinea pigs by the method of Bülbring and Wajda.

The addition of graded concentrations of epinephrine (1:25,000 to 1:400,000) increased the local anesthetic activity of a solution of 0.25 per cent propoxycaine HCl, the greatest effect being obtained with the highest concentration.

Epinephrine, levarterenol, and levo-nordefrin increased the duration of propoxycaine anesthesia. Linear dose-effect curves were obtained by plotting the average duration in minutes against the log of the vasoconstrictor concentration in solutions of 0.25 per cent propoxycaine.

In solutions containing epinephrine 1:100,000, changing the concentration of procaine from 0.5 to 4.0 per cent or that of propoxycaine from 0.25 to 2.0 per cent did not greatly prolong the duration of anesthesia.

The duration of action of the procaine solutions was shorter than that of the propoxycaine solutions.

These results show that in mixtures of propoxycaine (or procaine) and vasoconstrictors, in concentrations similar to those found in commercial dental anesthetic solutions, the duration of local anesthesia is influenced much more by the concentration of the vasoconstrictor than by that of the local anesthetic.

Submitted on December 3, 1959
Revised on February 23, 1960







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1960 Institutional Access Guidelines