JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 30(3): 314-321, 1951
© 1951 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MANLY, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by VINTON, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MANLY, R. S.
Right arrow Articles by VINTON, P.

A SURVEY OF THE CHEWING ABILITY OF DENTURE WEARERS

R. S. MANLY 1 and PAUL VINTON 1

1 Laboratory for Oral Physiology, Tufts College Dental School, Boston, Mass.

A survey of masticatory function has been conducted with one hundred denture patients in an effort to disclose which factors are the most important for determining a patient's ability in mastication. The measurements included the maximum biting force, food platform area, and masticatory performance with both peanuts and coconut as test foods. The patient was asked to name his food preference and those giving special difficulty in mastication. The statements were combined in a single score and designated as tough food tolerance. The average force and performance for denture wearers was much lower than for patients with natural dentition, and it varied widely from person to person.

The most important influence was possessed by the rating of clinical excellence of the denture. It was correlated moderately with the maximum biting force, the masticatory performance of peanuts, and the tough food tolerance. The age of the patient had a slight influence, the younger persons tending to have better performance and biting strength than older persons. The masticatory performance with peanuts was the best measure of a subject's tough food tolerance but was not well enough correlated to have much predictive value. When comparisons were made only on those dentures rated as clinically adequate, no correlation could be demonstrated between any of the factors studied.

Submitted on February 23, 1951







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1951 Institutional Access Guidelines