JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 29(1): 93-100, 1950
© 1950 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ENGLISH, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by DUDLEY, H. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ENGLISH, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by DUDLEY, H. C.

DISTRIBUTION OF RADIOACTIVE GALLIUM IN THE TEETH AND JAWS OF EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS

JAMES A. ENGLISH B.S., D.D.S., M.S.1 and H. C. DUDLEY Ph.D.1

1 Naval Medical Research Institutte, Bethesda, Md.

Radiogallium in the form of soluble gallium lactate (pH 7.0 to 7.4) was injected subcutaneously into rats and rabbits. The dosage was 0.2 to 0.4 millicuries of Ga72 per kilogram of body weight (6 mg./kg.), which is well below the toxic level. The animals were killed in six hours and thin sections (50 to 100 µ) were made of the bone and teeth by cutting with high speed abrasive discs and grinding to the desired thickness against an abrasive wheel. These thin sections were placed next to special x-ray film for 24 to 48 hours. The rays emanating from the radioactive isotope affected the film just as do the rays from an x-ray tube. The developed negatives were compared with transillumination photographs which were subsequently made from the ground sections. By this means it was determined that radiogallium is predominantly deposited in endosteum, periosteum, tooth pulp, and peridontium. There is a moderate deposition in cancellous bone. Cortical bone and the dentin of the root portion of teeth take a barely perceptible amount of radiogallium, whereas coronal dentin and enamel give no indication that any radiogallium is deposited. The main advantages of this method over those using the electroscope or Geiger counter for determining the radioactivity are that fractional portions of teeth and bone are not required, and the visual localization is rapid and effective. The relative distribution of the radioactive substance in each anatomic area is apparent; however, accurate quantitative measurements were not attempted in this study.

Submitted on April 16, 1949







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1950 Institutional Access Guidelines