JDR JDR Most Read Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 28(4): 398-414, 1949
© 1949 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HILL, I. N.
Right arrow Articles by BLAYNEY, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by HILL, I. N.
Right arrow Articles by BLAYNEY, J. R.

THE EVANSTON DENTAL CARIES STUDY

III. A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF FLUORINE IN COMMUNAL WATER SUPPLIES IN THE UNITED STATES

I. N. HILL D.D.S.1, O. E. JELINEK D.D.S.1, and J. R. BLAYNEY M.S., D.D.S.1

1 Walter G. Zoller Memorial Dental Clinic, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill., and Department of Health, Evanston, Ill.

The municipalities having a high fluorine content are found in nine states. with the greatest number in Texas and the next greatest number in South Dakota. There are approximately 5,646,897 people in the United States having access to a communal water supply containing fluorine in the amount of 0.5 ppm or more (Table VIII). This is approximately 4.307 per cent of the entire population of the United States. A total of 2,195,115 people are in the fluorine concentration bracket of 0.9 to 2.0 parts per million. In the 2.1 to 3.0 ppm bracket, there are 626,177 persons. In a still higher concentration of 3.1 to 5.0 ppm, there are 127,243 people (Table IX). Municipalities of high fluorine content, 5.1 ppm and higher, number only twenty-five and the number of people exposed to a high level of fluorine is not great, namely, 40,151. More detailed water analyses should be conducted to determine the fluorine content of water supplied to children during the years in which tooth formation is taking place.

The communities in the high fluorine areas, though few in number and low in population, should either (1) consider changing the source of their water supply, (2) remove excess fluorine by chemical means, or (3) reduce the fluorine content by adding water of lower fluorine concentration to arrive at a level which is not harmful and yet will provide protection against tooth decay.

Submitted on October 1, 1948




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of HealthHome page
J. Longwell
(d) Chemical and Technical Aspects
The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, January 1, 1957; 77(7): 361 - 374.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1949 Institutional Access Guidelines