JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 27(4): 524-531, 1948
© 1948 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by JENSEN, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by MÖLLER, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by JENSEN, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by MÖLLER, A.

DETERMINATION OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE APATITE PARTICLES IN DIFFERENT DENTAL ENAMELS AND IN DENTIN BY THE X-RAY POWDER METHOD

AKSEL TOVBORG JENSEN 1 and AASE MÖLLER 1

1 The Chemical Department of the Dentistry College and the Chemical Department of the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural College, Copenhagen, Denmark

Particle dimensions in enamel and dentin have not been determined with great accuracy up to now. We have determined the apparent particle size in a few enamel powders and in one dentin specimen and found that there are great differences in particle size in different enamels. Crystallite thickness ranging from some 600 Å in a fine human incisor to some 250 to 300 Å in human molars has been found. Figures for enamel from rabbit and beaver were somewhat lower.

The importance of particle sizes for discussions of enamel formulas is pointed out.

Enamel particles are uniformly developed in all directions; this contrasts with the apatite particles in bone which are elongated in the c-axis direction.

We have noted a curious effect in our enamel diagrams: The line broadening increases more with increasing particle size than expected for an assembly of error-free crystallites of uniform size. In other words, the apparent crystallite size calculated from higher order reflections is lower than that calculated from low-order reflections. This effect has not been explained.

The investigations are being continued.

Submitted on February 17, 1948







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1948 Institutional Access Guidelines