JDR Woodhead Publishing
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 27(4): 501-506, 1948
© 1948 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KITCHIN, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by ROBINSON, H. B. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by KITCHIN, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by ROBINSON, H. B. G.

HOW ABRASIVE NEED A DENTIFRICE BE?

PAUL C. KITCHIN 1 and HAMILTON B. G. ROBINSON 1

1 College of Dentistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

Stained pellicle is not produced by liquid dentifrices, but results from accumulation of stain on the teeth of certain individuals using water or other nonabrasive dentifrices. The degree of staining is an individual characteristic.

Using groups of dental students who were heavy stainers with brush and water, we determined staining of their teeth while they were using a series of commercial dentifrices of different degrees of abrasiveness. These dentifrices varied from water, which is practically nonabrasive when applied with crossbrushing to the cervical areas of teeth, to a commercial tooth powder capable of cutting a notch 4frac12 mm. deep with 100,000 strokes.

Dentifrice abrasiveness greater than that necessary to cut 1 mm. per 100,000 strokes into the cervical area of teeth with the apparatus employed, appears to be unnecessary even for very heavy stainers who would not constitute more than 20 per cent of a population. Only one of the commercial paste dentifrices tested was excessively abrasive for heavy stainers. The commercial powders tested, with one exception, were from 100 per cent to 300 per cent more abrasive than was found necessary to accomplish stain prevention in our tests on heavy stainers.

Generally speaking, for stainers with cervical exposure, a dentifrice with a safety index as high as is consistent with prevention of stain accumulation is desirable. Such a dentifrice should be determined on an individual basis.

Dentifrice abrasion, for obvious stainers, will be a necessary evil until a nonabrasive, stain-removing or preventing agent is found. Reliable current information on dentifrice abrasion, determined by testing whole dentifrices on dentin, should be available.

Submitted on February 11, 1948







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1948 Institutional Access Guidelines