|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section 11: An invention of propaganda in Monograph III is discussed, and its disavowal noted and emphasized.
Section III: The destructive character of Monograph III is illustrated. Assembled quotations from Dr. Palmer's reply, indicating a constructive position that was not shown in the Monograph, foreshadow a fair presentation of dental subjects in future publications by the American Child Health Association.
Section IV: Evidences of the unreliability of the data in the Monograph, and also the misleading character of some of its presentations, are discussed.
Section V: The treatment, in public clinics, of enamel defectsthe remaining chief issue in the discussionis considered, and the position of the Oral Hygiene Committee restated.
Section VI: A few additional disagreements with statements in Dr. Palmer's reply, of many that might be noted, are briefly indicated.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| IADR Journals | Advances in Dental Research ® |
| Journal of Dental Research ® | Critical Reviews (1990-2004) |