JDR JDR Most Cited Articles
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Dent Res 10(5): 591-598, 1930
© 1930 International and American Associations for Dental Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WAGENER, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by CURLEY, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by WAGENER, E. H.
Right arrow Articles by CURLEY, M.

THE LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF VINCENT'S INFECTION

EDNA HANNIBAL WAGENER A.B., A.M.1, ELMER McEVOY D.D.S.1, LOREN B. TABER B.S., D.D.S.1, and MARTIN CURLEY B.S.1

1 College of Physicians and Surgeons, San Francisco, Calif.

1. In Vincent's infection, and other pathological conditions of the mouth, direct smears contained several species of spirochetes, fusiform bacilli, and cocci.

2. The relative numbers of each of these organisms varied in smears from different parts of the mouth. Along the gingiva and in chronic cases of Vincent's infection, cocci, and thick crescent-shaped fusiform bacilli predominated. In acute Vincent's infection, and in deep necrotic pockets, the predominating organism was Treponema vincenti.

3. We consider our laboratory diagnosis of Vincent's infection positive only when Treponema vincenti is found as the predominating organism.

4. Attempts to produce experimental Vincent's stomatitis in kittens were unsuccessful, possibly because of a species immunity to the organisms productive of this disease.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
IADR Journals Advances in Dental Research ®
Journal of Dental Research ® Critical Reviews (1990-2004)
Copyright © 1930 Institutional Access Guidelines